Economic Survey

India Economic Survey 2009-10

Restoring Growth and Fiscal Prudence

GDP Growth (Actual)

8.6%

Forecast: 7.0-7.5%

Inflation (CPI)

12.4%

Consumer Price Index

Wholesale Inflation (WPI)

3.8%

Wholesale Price Index

Fiscal Deficit

6.5% GDP

Union Budget (Actuals)

Key Theme

Restoring Growth and Fiscal Prudence

Key Highlights

GDP growth rebounded strongly to 8.6%, well above the 7.0-7.5% forecast, confirming India's V-shaped recovery
India was among the first major economies to recover from the Global Financial Crisis
CPI inflation surged to 12.4%, driven by a severe food price crisis as drought hit agricultural output
WPI inflation remained moderate at 3.8% due to different commodity weightings, masking food distress
The massive divergence between CPI (12.4%) and WPI (3.8%) highlighted the inadequacy of WPI as the policy anchor
Fiscal deficit remained elevated at 6.5% of GDP as stimulus measures continued
The stock market staged a dramatic recovery — the Sensex doubled from its March 2009 lows
FII inflows returned strongly at $17 billion, reflecting renewed global appetite for emerging market assets
Sugar prices tripled during the year as production crashed to 14 million tonnes from 26 million
The government announced an aggressive disinvestment programme targeting Rs 40,000 crore
The UPA government was re-elected in May 2009 with a stronger mandate, removing coalition constraints on policymaking

Policy Recommendations

1 Begin withdrawing fiscal stimulus in a calibrated manner to restore fiscal health
2 Address the food inflation crisis through structural measures: investment in cold chains, storage, and processing
3 Transition the inflation targeting framework from WPI to CPI as the primary policy anchor
4 Execute the disinvestment programme aggressively to reduce fiscal deficit and improve public sector efficiency
5 Introduce the Direct Taxes Code to rationalize income tax and improve compliance
6 Fast-track the GST legislation to create a unified national market
7 Reform the food subsidy system through targeted cash transfers instead of physical distribution
8 Invest in agricultural research and extension services to improve yield growth
9 Strengthen the financial inclusion agenda through banking correspondent networks
10 Develop a credible medium-term fiscal consolidation plan anchored in expenditure reform

Survey Predictions vs Budget Outcomes

Comparison between Economic Survey predictions and actual Union Budget allocations

Metric	Survey Prediction	Actual Budget	Deviation
GDP Growth (%)	7.0-7.5	8.6	+1.1 to +1.6% — stimulus-driven recovery was stronger and faster than expected
CPI Inflation (%)	5.0-6.0	12.4	+6.4 to +7.4% — severe food price inflation far exceeded any forecast
Fiscal Deficit (% of GDP)	5.5	6.5	+1.0% — continued stimulus and revenue shortfall kept deficit elevated
FII Flows ($ Bn)	+5 to +8	+17	+$9-12 Bn — global risk appetite recovered faster than expected
Foodgrain Production (Mn T)	225-230	218	-7 to -12 Mn T — drought reduced kharif output significantly

Union Budget 2009-10 Summary

Corresponding budget data to read alongside the Economic Survey Actuals

Total Receipts

10.28 lakh crore

Total Expenditure

10.24 lakh crore

Fiscal Deficit

4.18 lakh crore

Revenue Deficit

3.24 lakh crore

View Union Budget 2009-10 in detail

Detailed Analysis

The Economic Survey for 2009-10, the first prepared under the newly appointed Chief Economic Adviser Kaushik Basu — a distinguished academic who had spent decades at Cornell University before being called to Delhi — was a document that reflected both professional analytical rigor and the optimism of a new intellectual leadership. India had bounced back from the global financial crisis with an 8.6 per cent growth rate, among the most impressive recoveries in the world, and the Survey's task was to explain why while also confronting an emerging and potentially dangerous complication: surging food inflation. The recovery narrative was compelling. After growing at just 6.7 per cent in the crisis year of 2008-09, the economy accelerated sharply, driven by the massive fiscal and monetary stimulus, the revival of global capital flows, and the inherent resilience of domestic demand. Government consumption spending grew at over 10 per cent in real terms, public investment expanded as infrastructure projects were fast-tracked, and the three stimulus packages had provided direct support to affected sectors. The RBI's aggressive monetary easing had transmitted to lending rates, and credit growth recovered to around 17 per cent. The private sector also responded. The stock market's remarkable recovery — the Sensex doubled from its March 2009 lows to cross 17,000 by February 2010 — restored household wealth and corporate confidence. FII inflows surged to $17 billion as global investors, flush with liquidity from extraordinary monetary easing in the West, rotated back into emerging markets. Corporate investment intentions, as measured by new project announcements, recovered from their crisis lows. Consumer spending on durables, automobiles, and housing picked up, particularly in the second half of the year. But the inflation picture cast a shadow over the recovery story. CPI inflation — particularly the Consumer Price Index for Industrial Workers (CPI-IW) — surged to 12.4 per cent, the highest level in over a decade. The primary driver was food prices. India experienced a severe drought during the 2009 monsoon, with rainfall 22 per cent below the long-period average — the worst shortfall since 2002. Kharif production was hit hard, and several food commodities saw extraordinary price spikes. Sugar was the most dramatic case: production crashed from 26 million tonnes to 14 million tonnes, and retail prices roughly tripled. Pulses, vegetables, and milk also saw significant price increases. The Survey devoted what was effectively a mini-thesis to understanding India's food inflation problem. Basu, bringing his academic perspective, argued that the issue was fundamentally structural: Indian agriculture had been starved of investment for decades, yield growth had stagnated, and the supply of protein-rich foods (pulses, dairy, meat, eggs) had not kept pace with the rising demand driven by urbanization and income growth. The marketing and distribution chain was inefficient, with multiple layers of intermediation that drove a wedge between farm-gate and consumer prices. Cold chain infrastructure was woefully inadequate, resulting in post-harvest losses of 25-40 per cent for fruits and vegetables. These structural arguments, while not new, were presented with a clarity and analytical depth that influenced the subsequent policy debate. A significant analytical contribution of this Survey was its discussion of the WPI-CPI divergence. WPI inflation was a moderate 3.8 per cent, suggesting a benign price environment, while CPI at 12.4 per cent told a story of severe cost-of-living pressures, particularly for the poor. The Survey argued that WPI — which included manufacturing inputs and intermediates but underweighted food and services — was an inadequate measure of the inflation that households experienced. It recommended transitioning to CPI as the primary policy anchor for monetary policy, a recommendation that would eventually be implemented when the RBI formally adopted CPI-based inflation targeting in 2016. The fiscal situation was the Survey's other major concern. The deficit remained elevated at 6.5 per cent of GDP, as stimulus measures continued and tax revenues remained below their pre-crisis trajectory. The combined Centre-state deficit was close to 10 per cent of GDP — a level that, the Survey warned, was unsustainable if maintained for more than a year or two. Government debt was approaching 80 per cent of GDP (Centre and states combined), and interest payments were consuming an uncomfortably large share of revenue. The Survey called for a "credible and time-bound" fiscal consolidation plan, but the specifics of such a plan — which expenditures to cut, which revenues to raise — were politically charged. The government had announced an ambitious disinvestment programme targeting Rs 40,000 crore, and the Survey was supportive. It argued that selling minority stakes in profitable public sector companies served multiple objectives: raising non-debt capital to reduce the fiscal deficit, improving corporate governance through greater market scrutiny, and deepening the equity market. The Oil India and NHPC IPOs during the year were cited as successful examples. External sector dynamics had normalized after the crisis disruption. The current account deficit widened to 2.8 per cent of GDP — higher than the pre-crisis level — as the recovery in domestic demand sucked in imports. Gold imports surged as households, worried about inflation, sought a hedge. Capital flows were more than adequate to finance the deficit, with FDI remaining stable and portfolio flows buoyant. The rupee recovered from its crisis lows, appreciating to around Rs 46 per dollar. The climate change debate was increasingly influencing India's economic policy discourse. The Copenhagen summit of December 2009 had put India under international pressure to commit to emissions reduction targets, and the Survey engaged with the tension between development aspirations and environmental responsibility. India's per capita emissions were a small fraction of those in developed countries, but its aggregate emissions were growing rapidly as coal-fired power generation expanded. The Survey argued for a differentiated responsibility framework that recognized developing countries' right to grow while committing to improved energy efficiency and a gradual transition toward cleaner energy sources. The National Action Plan on Climate Change, announced in 2008, was cited as a step in the right direction. The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), launched under the chairmanship of Nandan Nilekani, was beginning its mammoth task of assigning a unique 12-digit identification number to every resident. The Survey recognized the Aadhaar project's transformative potential for governance: by providing a reliable identity infrastructure, it could enable direct cash transfers, reduce subsidy leakage, improve financial inclusion, and strengthen the delivery of public services. At the time of the Survey, enrollment had begun in select districts, and the full implications of the platform — which would eventually cover 1.3 billion people — were still being understood. The Survey estimated that Aadhaar-enabled direct benefit transfers could save the exchequer Rs 50,000-70,000 crore annually by eliminating ghost beneficiaries and reducing diversion. The financial inclusion agenda received dedicated attention. Despite the rapid growth of the banking sector, over 40 per cent of Indian adults still lacked a bank account, and credit penetration in rural areas was abysmally low. The Survey discussed the business correspondent model, under which banks could extend services through agents in unbanked areas, and the potential for mobile banking to leapfrog traditional brick-and-mortar branch expansion. The committee on financial inclusion headed by C. Rangarajan had submitted recommendations, and the RBI was pushing banks to expand their geographic reach. The Survey's discussion of India's post-crisis growth prospects was cautiously optimistic. It argued that the potential growth rate remained in the 8-9 per cent range, supported by demographics, the unfinished infrastructure buildout, and the productivity catch-up potential in agriculture and manufacturing. But it identified fiscal consolidation and inflation control as the two preconditions for sustaining that trajectory, and warned that failure on either front could trap the economy in a cycle of high deficits, high inflation, and moderate growth. This warning would prove prescient: the next three years saw exactly the combination of fiscal slippage and inflation persistence that the Survey had cautioned against.

Source: Official Economic Survey Document

Previous Survey

Economic Survey 2008-09

Navigating the Global Financial Storm

Next Survey

Economic Survey 2010-11

Sustaining the Recovery

Budget follows the Economic Survey

The Economic Survey sets the context for the Union Budget presented the next day

View Union Budget 2009-10 →